* Dmitry Smirnov: > On Wednesday, 6 July 2016 9:59:32 PM AEST Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: >> What's the current status? Is there technical progress compared to what was >> discussed in April? The freeze is coming really close and we can't support >> the status quo for stretch. > > Perhaps I'm not the best person to speak on the matter as I've never > touched any Golang tools except dh-golang. Situation with Golab > libraries is not ideal (to say the least) but I understand that > Golang is not the only language without concept of dynamic > linking. As I recall someone mentioned Haskell as another example. > > It is my understanding that when vulnerability is fixed in Golang > library it should be sufficient to NMU (re-build) all reverse > dependencies.
Part of the problem is that we currently lack a decent way to list all these reverse dependencies. _______________________________________________ Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers
