* Michael Hudson-Doyle: > On 10 July 2016 at 07:39, Florian Weimer <f...@deneb.enyo.de> wrote: >> * Dmitry Smirnov: >> >>> On Friday, 8 July 2016 8:53:20 AM AEST Florian Weimer wrote: >>>> Part of the problem is that we currently lack a decent way to list all >>>> these reverse dependencies. >>> >>> We can get list of all source packages to re-build from reverse build >>> dependencies. Then it should be possible to filter arch:any >>> packages to bin- >>> NMU. >>> >>> Alternatively Built-Using field could be of help. >> >> We already discussed why this doesn't work with the present state of >> the metadata. > > Do you mean the "B-U is only direct dependencies" problem? That's > fixed now.
Hmm. I poked at a few packages, and here is what I found: golang-siphash-dev does not have any Built-Using header. golang-gopkg-tylerb-graceful.v1-dev does not list golang-x-text, although its dependency golang-golang-x-net-dev was built using it. (I'm looking at unstable.) Would this be fixable through a mass rebuild? > Was there something else? The dependency-generating script does not end up in Built-Using. I think we discussed including its version at some point. _______________________________________________ Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list Pkgemail@example.com http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers