On Monday, 11 July 2016 8:01:30 PM AEST Martín Ferrari wrote:
> > Noted. I'm not against fixing the problem but there are more important
> > issues to prioritise.
> 
> I think this is not a valid argument.

If you believe those issues are the most important ones to fix then be my 
guest and start addressing them as a matter of priority. You are welcome to 
work on those issues.

Yet you may notice that those problems are not among ones that seriously  
affect users or other packages hence I don't feel inclined to prioritise 
them.


> Chris is right that the packages
> are not following policy, and that they should be fixed.

Yes, he is right. Your point?


> Packaging all
> the world software does not serve our users if we are not following our
> procedures.

I think understand your implications. I'm doing shitty work, you mean.
May I suggest you to maybe shut up?


> I have seen already a few instances of packages you prepared where you
> just skip the tests, or skip failures, instead of fixing the real
> problems these are covering. This is not good for Debian and it is
> definitely not good for the team.

Thanks for criticism but I really got enough of it from you already.


> Please, reconsider your attitude.

I'd like to recommend you to do the same.
I'm starting to feel pissed off by your rude passive aggressive attitude and 
nitpicking...

-- 
Regards,
 Dmitry Smirnov.

---

The surest way to corrupt a youth is to instruct him to hold in higher
esteem those who think alike than those who think differently.
        -- Friedrich Nietzsche

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers

Reply via email to