On Monday, 11 July 2016 8:01:30 PM AEST Martín Ferrari wrote: > > Noted. I'm not against fixing the problem but there are more important > > issues to prioritise. > > I think this is not a valid argument.
If you believe those issues are the most important ones to fix then be my
guest and start addressing them as a matter of priority. You are welcome to
work on those issues.
Yet you may notice that those problems are not among ones that seriously
affect users or other packages hence I don't feel inclined to prioritise
them.
> Chris is right that the packages
> are not following policy, and that they should be fixed.
Yes, he is right. Your point?
> Packaging all
> the world software does not serve our users if we are not following our
> procedures.
I think understand your implications. I'm doing shitty work, you mean.
May I suggest you to maybe shut up?
> I have seen already a few instances of packages you prepared where you
> just skip the tests, or skip failures, instead of fixing the real
> problems these are covering. This is not good for Debian and it is
> definitely not good for the team.
Thanks for criticism but I really got enough of it from you already.
> Please, reconsider your attitude.
I'd like to recommend you to do the same.
I'm starting to feel pissed off by your rude passive aggressive attitude and
nitpicking...
--
Regards,
Dmitry Smirnov.
---
The surest way to corrupt a youth is to instruct him to hold in higher
esteem those who think alike than those who think differently.
-- Friedrich Nietzsche
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers
