On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 10:49:22PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 09:05:19PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > Ok, sorry, but then please retitle the bug and drop the FTBFS word.
> I am just a random person going through RC bugs, but that sounds like a
> good idea so I'm doing that now.
Thank you. I was going to do exactly the same but have been faster.
> > When a package fails to build from source, there are no runtime
> > problems at all, because the binary package does not even exist.
> That is only true when the build always fails (see my next email).
Indeed. When I wrote that I was still confused about why "FTBFS"
was in the subject of this report.
Maybe he meant that the package made others packages to FTBFS (?).
I don't know.
Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list