Hello Tim.

Sorry for top posting. I just forgot to mention that we give focus on
ppc64el here.

So, we need to have it built on that architecture and so the tests will
be likely conducted on it as well.


On 08-11-2016 08:02, Fernando Seiti Furusato wrote:
> Hello Tim.
>
>
> Thanks for the prompt response.
>
>
> On 07-11-2016 18:47, Potter, Tim (HPE Linux Support) wrote:
>> Hi Fernando.
>>
>> On 8 Nov 2016, at 3:07 AM, Fernando Seiti Furusato 
>> <ferse...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>>> Hello, team.
>>>
>>> I see that flannel packaging is already on going [1] and, according
>>> to PET [2], it is ready to upload.
>> I've just set the distro back to UNRELEASED to indicate that it's not ready 
>> for upload.  (-:
> Got it!
>
>>> Are you planning to have it uploaded?
>> Not quite yet.  The package builds correctly, but I haven't done any actual 
>> testing on it
>> so it's not ready for upload.
> How do I get it to actually build?
> I see that it is not easy as just running debian/rules binary.
> I got the dependencies installed and all, but could not get GOPATH and
> GOROOT variables right.
>
>>> I tried packaging it myself, but I see it is not very straightforward
>>> for dummies (me).
>>> Anyway, let me know if there is any way I can help on it.
>> Are you familiar enough with flannel to help test it?  I can work on the 
>> package some
>> today and bash it into better shape.
> I am not really familiar, but I can get someone who is to do that.
>
> Thanks!
>

-- 
Fernando Seiti Furusato
IBM Linux Technology Center


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers

Reply via email to