Sorry for my late reply, life was pretty busy the last few days.. On 27/01/18 16:29, Alexandre Viau wrote: > I don't think the advantages are worth renaming. It could create confusion. > > I don't mind doing it, but please also consider that I would have to > rename the team in the 150 packages that I already migrated. While I won't suggest a change for the sake of it, I think the fact that some packages were migrated before we had this discussion should not be a determining factor. This is why I complained when you started doing it.
Now, on to the name itself, I think it'd be wise to try to have a similar scheme to other teams. Dunno if there is any consensus yet, but for example the perl team has gone for perl-team. -- Martín Ferrari (Tincho) _______________________________________________ Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers