Sorry for my late reply, life was pretty busy the last few days..

On 27/01/18 16:29, Alexandre Viau wrote:
> I don't think the advantages are worth renaming. It could create confusion.
> 
> I don't mind doing it, but please also consider that I would have to
> rename the team in the 150 packages that I already migrated.
While I won't suggest a change for the sake of it, I think the fact that
some packages were migrated before we had this discussion should not be
a determining factor. This is why I complained when you started doing it.

Now, on to the name itself, I think it'd be wise to try to have a
similar scheme to other teams. Dunno if there is any consensus yet, but
for example the perl team has gone for perl-team.

-- 
Martín Ferrari (Tincho)

_______________________________________________
Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers

Reply via email to