Your message dated Thu, 6 Jun 2019 06:02:55 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#930044: Fonts rough
has caused the Debian Bug report #930044,
regarding Fonts rough
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
930044: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=930044
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: josm
Version: 0.0.svn15155+dfsg-1~exp1
Severity: minor
Zoom this screenshot.
Is that how the fonts are supposed to look? Thanks.
Versions of packages josm depends on:
ii default-jre [java9-runtime] 2:1.11-71
ii fonts-noto 20181227-1
ii jmapviewer 2.10+dfsg-1~exp1
ii libcommons-compress-java 1.18-2
ii libcommons-logging-java 1.2-2
ii libgettext-commons-java 0.9.6-6
ii liboauth-signpost-java 1.2.1.2-2
ii openjdk-11-jre [java9-runtime] 11.0.4+4-1
ii openjfx 11.0.2+1-1
ii proj-data 6.1.0-1~exp1
Versions of packages josm recommends:
pn josm-l10n <none>
josm suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
tags 930044 unreproducible
thanks
On 6/6/19 4:03 AM, 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson wrote:
> Is that how the fonts are supposed to look? Thanks.
On your fucked up system? Yes. Looks fine on mine.
--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
Pkg-grass-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
