Dear Sebastiaan,
> On 17 Feb 2021, at 09:28, Sebastiaan Couwenberg <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 2/17/21 8:31 AM, Antonio Valentino wrote: >> 96793375 by Antonio Valentino at 2021-02-17T06:54:28+00:00 >> Set distribution to unstable > > These changes don't seem appropriate for unstable since the soft freeze > has started: > > " > Starting 2021-02-12, only small, targeted fixes are appropriate for > bullseye. We want maintainers to focus on small, targeted fixes. This > is mainly at the maintainers discretion, there will be no hard rule > that will be enforced. > > [...] > > Don't upload changes to unstable that are not targeted for bullseye. > Having changes in unstable that are not targeted/appropriate for > bullseye could complicate fixes for your package and related packages > (like dependencies and reverse dependencies). > " > > https://release.debian.org/bullseye/freeze_policy.html#soft > The new upstream version contains small bug fixes that it could make sense to have in bullseye. Nothing critical of course. Also I have tested (locally) the new version with all the reverse dependencies (satpy and pyspectral). > Please change the distribution to experimental and update the package > revision appropriately, or explain why these changes should be included > in bullseye. OK, no problem, I can target it to experimental if you prefer. Jus I can’t do it right now because I’m starting a long teleconference meeting. Kind regards -- Antonio Valentino _______________________________________________ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list [email protected] https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
