Hi Bas, All issues you mentioned should be addressed by now.
Regarding this: On 9/4/21 8:32 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > Why keep the mapnik version hardcoded? This requires source changes when > the major or minor version of mapnik is incremented (e.g. 3.2 or 4.0). > Using the version detected a build time makes rebuilding the package > with a binNMU sufficient. I suggest to use links for this, so the config file can stay the same and packaging is taking the bourden to ensure it links to the right version. Is this a viable option? Thanks, Felix _______________________________________________ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list [email protected] https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
