Hi, thanks for comment.
I'm one of the upstrem maintainer of this software. And unfortunately, this
software hasn't been publicly developed yet(Of course the license follows
DFSG).
In other words, these patche's has been reported upstream, but there are no
public bug trackers.
In this case, what the value should I set? not-needed(but not vendor specific)?
Of course, I know it's better to move to public development, and I'm
convincing it.
Best wishes,
Youhei
On November 2, 2021 4:30:09 PM Sebastiaan Couwenberg <[email protected]>
wrote:
On 11/2/21 07:57, Youhei SASAKI (@uwabami) wrote:
=====================================
debian/patches/0001-Fix-NArray-Library-Path.patch
=====================================
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
From: Debian GIS Project <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2013 01:23:50 +0900
Subject: Fix NArray Library Path
+Forwarded: yes
In Debian, NArray was installed $vendorarchdir.
This patch fix search path for NArray.
Where were these patches forwarded to?
From DEP-3:
"
Forwarded (optional)
Any value other than "no" or "not-needed" means that the patch has been
forwarded upstream. Ideally the value is an URL proving that it has
been forwarded and where one can find more information about its
inclusion status.
If the field is missing, its implicit value is "yes" if the "Bug" field
is present, otherwise it's "no". The field is really required only if
the patch is vendor specific, in that case its value should be
"not-needed" to indicate that the patch must not be forwarded upstream
(whereas "no" simply means that it has not yet been done).
"
https://dep-team.pages.debian.net/deps/dep3/
Kind Regards,
Bas
--
GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1
_______________________________________________
Pkg-grass-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
