On 6/6/24 8:05 AM, Antonio Valentino wrote:
Il 01/06/24 19:53, Sebastiaan Couwenberg ha scritto:
On 6/1/24 7:33 PM, Antonio Valentino wrote:
Maybe it is just too early, but the message in the tracker [1] looks
misleading to me.
It is certainly misleading, doris is only available for amd64, but
arm64 is part of NOBREAKALL_ARCHES alongside amd64, see:
https://release.debian.org/britney/britney.conf
arm64 replaced i386 there some time ago.
https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/britney2/-/merge_requests/51
You'll need to ask the Release Team for a britney hint to get doris to
migrate without having an arm64 package available.
Before contacting the release team I was wondering if a new upload could
not fix things.
In principle there is no particular reason why doris should not build on
arm, and I thin that we had it in the past.
I also remember that at some point we decided to ask for the removal of
all non x86_64 architectures, but I do not remember exactly why.
Unfortunately I was not able to find the old email thread where we
discussed it.
Do you remember something?
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-grass-devel/2023-December/104215.html
Packages requiring binary uploads should only be available on amd64.
See also the release.d.o bugreport linked in the above thread:
https://bugs.debian.org/1059226
Kind Regards,
Bas
--
GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1
_______________________________________________
Pkg-grass-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
