On 2/6/26 11:57 AM, [email protected] wrote:
There are some fixes that could be made to debian/copyright and debian/control
Full review details: https://dfsg-new-queue.debian.org/reviews/qgis
The duck m/\bnot maintained\b/i are a false positive:
"
At the GIS stackexchange or r/QGIS reddit, which are not maintained by the
QGIS team, but where the QGIS and broader GIS community provides lots of advice
"
The http: URLs are verbatim copies from the respective source files.
The dodgy check is questionable, "Possible hardcoded password" issues are false
positives. And if they weren't that's something you should report upstream, it has
nothing to do with DFSG compliance.
The copyright check complaint about MIT is likewise of little value. We know
which version of the MIT license is predominant, and we include the text in the
license paragraph.
cme also fails to parse the license alternatives correctly, "LGPL-2.1 with Digia Qt
LGPL Exception 1.1" is declared in a standalone license paragraph.
The cme complaints about unnecessary version requirements are also irrelevant
for DFSG compliance.
Because of the false positive tendency of these tools, they are not used in our
package update work flows.
I'm probably wasting my time replying to an automated message, so I'll only do
this once just for the record.
Kind Regards,
Bas
--
PGP Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1
_______________________________________________
Pkg-grass-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
