On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 04:54:01PM +0100, mentors.debian.net importer wrote:
> Your upload was successful. These packages are now available:
> - gdal
> If you think you found a bug or just want to contact us please send
> an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks for using our service.

What's the reason to embed a double versioning scheme in the package
name? Is it anyway better than using a simple libgdal-1.3.1 name?
It appears a bit confusing in respect with consolidated conventions,
consider that release team or QA could also add/require a suffix from time
to time due to periodical :) C++ ABI changes...

Francesco P. Lovergine

Pkg-grass-devel mailing list

Reply via email to