On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 01:45:57PM +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> The inclusion of libgeotiff (which is included in debian gdal if
> I'm not wrong) in fedora extras is blocked by a licencing issue that
> may be relevant for debian.
> It seems like some data included in libgeotiff is covered by:
> 3. The data may not be distributed for profit by any third party;
> completed by
> With regard to (3) above, the data may be included within proprietary
> applications distributed on a commercial basis when the commerciality
> is based on application functionality and not on a value ascribed to
> the freely-distributed EPSG dataset.
This is relevant. I would move those data into a non-free package a part.
That would involve re-packaging the upstream tarball, of course.
> The intention of the epsg people is certainly to have their data bundled
> with free software, but the comment doesn't seems to fit that goal. Indeed
> in case of free software, the commercial basis isn't necessarily based on
> the application functionnality, since application is available freely
> What is your opinion on that issue?
> The fedora extras inclusion review is here:
> I sent also that mail to the other people involved in the fedora review
> but since I didn't ask them they are hidden.
Francesco P. Lovergine
Pkg-grass-devel mailing list