Author: gmascellani-guest
Date: 2009-05-21 22:14:07 +0000 (Thu, 21 May 2009)
New Revision: 2227

Modified:
   packages/josm-plugins/trunk/debian/TODO.Debian
Log:
Information on many plugins filled


Modified: packages/josm-plugins/trunk/debian/TODO.Debian
===================================================================
--- packages/josm-plugins/trunk/debian/TODO.Debian      2009-05-21 16:01:26 UTC 
(rev 2226)
+++ packages/josm-plugins/trunk/debian/TODO.Debian      2009-05-21 22:14:07 UTC 
(rev 2227)
@@ -1,18 +1,83 @@
 * Add more plugins: which are the problems?
+  + cadastre_fr
+    - license: MAYBE, there is GPL-2 license file, but nothing is said in 
sources
+    - build.xml: OK, needs anti-SVN patch
+  + create_grid_of_ways
+    - license: unknown, copyright holder unknown too
+    - build.xml: OK, needs anti-SVN patch
+  + DirectUpload
+    - license: GPL, version not specified, although there is the text of GPL-2 
(Copyright by Subhodip Biswas)
+    - build.xml: OK, needs anti-SVN patch
   + editgpx
-    - license: OK, GPL (Copyright 2008. Martin Garbe (leo at running-sheep dot 
com))
+    - license: GPL, version not specified (Copyright 2008. Martin Garbe (leo 
at running-sheep dot com))
     - build.xml: OK, needs anti-SVN patch
+  + globalsat
+    - license: quite confusing. In plugin root there is a LICENSE file, that 
states
+      the plugin is "copyrighted 2007-2009 by Stafan Kaintoch and Raphael Mack 
<ram...@raphael-mack.de>"
+      and is distributed GPL-3+. Many .java files are copyrighted by Kaintoch 
or Mack
+      and don't specify any license. A file (copyright by Mack), says 
"License: GPL v2 or later (v3 preferred)"
+      and another (copyrighted by Mack and Immanuel Scholz) is GPL-2+. I think
+      redistribution of the whole plugin is allowed under GPL-3+ terms.
+    - build.xml: OK, needs anti-SVN patch and specification of build 
dependencies
+    - dependencies: depends on rxtx, which is in Debian
   + grid
     - license: unknown, copyright holder too
     - build.xml: OK, needs anti-SVN patch
+  + imagewaypoint
+    - license: unknown, copyright holder unknown too
+    - build.xml: OK, needs anti-SVN patch
+  + lakewalker
+    - license: unclear. Some files are "Copyright (c) 2000-2007 by Rodney 
Kinney, Brent Easton"
+      and LGPL (version unknown), other have no copyright or license 
specification
+    - build.xml: OK, needs anti-SVN patch
+  + nearclick
+    - license: unknown, copyright holder unknown too
+    - build.xml: OK, needs anti-SVN patch
   + openstreetbugs
     - license: OK, seems to be 3-clause BSD or something like (Copyright (c) 
2008, Henrik Niehaus)
     - build.xml: OK, needs anti-SVN patch
+  + osmarender
+    - license: unknown, copyright holder unknown too
+    - build.xml: OK, needs anti-SVN patch
+    - dependencies: Firefox or other browser?
+  + piclayer
+    - license: OK, GPL-2+ (Copyright (C) 2009 by Tomasz Stelmach)
+    - build.xml: OK, needs anti-SVN patch
+  + plastic_laf
+    - license: unknown, copyright holder unknown too
+    - build.xml: OK, needs anti-SVN patch
+    - dependencies: depends on looks, which is in Debian
+  + remotecontrol
+    - license: MAYBE, GPL-2+ and copyright holder (Frederik Ramm) stated in
+      LICENSE and CONTRIBUTION files, but not on source files themselves.
+    - build.xml: OK, needs anti-SVN patch
   + routing
-    - license: MAYBE: GPL-2+ text is clearly stated, but copyright string
+    - license: MAYBE, GPL-2+ text is clearly stated, but copyright string
       (Copyright (C) 2008 Innovant) is not very precise. Is it enough?
     - build.xml: OK, needs anti-SVN patch and specification of build 
dependencies
     - dependencies: depends on jgraph and log4j, which are both in Debian
+  + tageditor
+    - licese: copyright holder unknown; LICENSE contains GPL-2 text, but no
+      indication of license is present on sources
+    - build.xml: OK, needs anti-SVN patch
+  + tcxplugin
+    - license: quite confusing. A source says "License: GPL. For details, see 
LICENSE file.",
+      but there is no LICENSE file. It reports no copyright holder indication.
+      Conversely, the other states "(c) Copyright by M.IT 2002-2008" and has a 
link
+      to www.emaitie.de, but without telling nothing about the license
+    - build.xml: MAYBE. The build.xml could be used as is, just like most of 
the
+      other plugins (with the usual anti-SVN patch), but many source files 
appears
+      to be generated automatically by JAXB. build.xml doesn't take care of
+      regenerating them, but I think we should, as these sources aren't really
+      a "source", but rather an intermediate form. So build.xml needs patching
+      and I don't know how extensively this must be done.
+    - dependencies: depends on JAXB, which I think is not available in Debian; 
I don't
+      know whether libjaxme-java is an acceptable alternative. Morover 
tcxplugin
+      depends on jsr173: libjsr107cache-java is in Debian, are they the same 
thing?
+  + terracer
+    - license: two files say "Copyright 2009 CloudMade Ltd." and are GPL-2. 
Another
+      file has no indications. The LICENSE file contains the text of GPL-2.
+    - build.xml: OK, needs anti-SVN patch
   + usertools
-    - license: unknown, copyright holder too
+    - license: unknown, copyright holder unknown too
     - build.xml: OK, needs anti-SVN patch


_______________________________________________
Pkg-grass-devel mailing list
Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel

Reply via email to