On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 08:28:09AM +0800, YunQiang Su wrote: > Is the 1.3.0 version of libgeotiff working? > > On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 1:24 AM, Francesco P. Lovergine > <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 10:33:09AM +0800, YunQiang Su wrote: > >> Opticks is an expandable remote sensing and imagery analysis software > >> platform that is free and open source. > >> > >> Is somebody here working on packaging it in Debian? > >> > > > > Still not. > > > >> If there is no,I will try to do this job. > > > > Note that there's at least some criticities for linking current > > libgeotiff. The other dependency on ossim is currently available. > > I'm available for sponsoring and cooperating. > >
The problem is http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=558733 AFAIK it does not depend on version. A definitive solution could be adopting versioned symbols in gdal, which would render the library not binary-compatible with third parties binaries. A work around is fixing linking order in Opticks (i.e. linking geotiff *before* gdal). Anyway some specific tests should be conducted about that. That said, at least the first solution should go in squeeze+1. -- Francesco P. Lovergine _______________________________________________ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
