Francesco P. Lovergine schrieb am Montag, den 15. November um 11:19 Uhr: > This is also something bad, because it violates the original upstream will > IMHO.
Yes it does because Mapnik is licenced under LGPL > Note also that the embedded copy is a 2.3 or 2.4 version, and we used the > same approach for mapserver to avoid those kind of problems. Its a patched version of 2.4 > Seriously someone should consider an AGG fork from 2.4 > which is something maybe mapserver folks already did. I posted an URL to the discussion of the problem. In there it has been mentioned, that they consider 2.5 dead anyway and that currently 2.4 development ist going on here: http://agg.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/agg/agg-2.4/ See http://www.mail-archive.com/mapnik-us...@lists.berlios.de/msg02970.html > My best guessing is moving to the embedded copy if resulting issues are > grave enough to compromise its use. There are occasional hangs of the rendering library resulting in 100% CPU usage. Sven -- "I'm a bastard, and proud of it" (Linus Torvalds, Wednesday Sep 6, 2000) /me is gig...@ircnet, http://sven.gegg.us/ on the Web _______________________________________________ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkgfirstname.lastname@example.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel