Francesco wrote:
> so please load your version on the svn repository under
> tarballs/ branch to at least try building the previous
> version. I noted the upstream tree is full of binaries which
> require apparently a nearby licensing analysis....

Hi,

in the mentor review Paul didn't like keeping the tarball in
svn. I don't really like to keep binaries in svn either, but
I do like the history/audit trail that a SCM provides.

Paul Wise wrote:
> Another solution is to use the alioth web space, like pkg-games
> do:
> http://pkg-games.alioth.debian.org/tarballs/

so for the latest source release I've experimentally put it here:
  http://pkg-grass.alioth.debian.org/tarballs/

do you prefer that, or should we go back to the tarballs/ dir in
svn? I don't really mind.  we could keep the md5sums in svn?


thanks,
Hamish

_______________________________________________
Pkg-grass-devel mailing list
Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel

Reply via email to