On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 09:24:58PM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 09:34:20AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > First because having more than one shared lib per binary package is a
> > recipe for trouble down the road.  Second, the c++ libs were only built
> > with the serial libhdf5 variant, not with any of the mpi ones; I don't
> > know why, and am not familiar enough with hdf5 to know if that makes any
> > difference.
> > 
> http://www.hdfgroup.org/hdf5-quest.html#p5thread, 

OK, so this is saying that MPI-enabled HDF5 is not compatible with
C++?  Then there wouldn't be a proliferation of packages that I
worried about.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Pkg-grass-devel mailing list

Reply via email to