On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 06:24:16AM +0000, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> why does libgdal1h provide libgdal1? If it is binary compatible why was the
> package name changed? If it is not binary compatible it shouldn't claim
> otherwise.
> 

Indeed it is not due to dropped tiff/geotiff functions. Let me re-upload with
the fix.

-- 
Francesco P. Lovergine

_______________________________________________
Pkg-grass-devel mailing list
Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel

Reply via email to