On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 06:24:16AM +0000, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: > Hi, > > why does libgdal1h provide libgdal1? If it is binary compatible why was the > package name changed? If it is not binary compatible it shouldn't claim > otherwise. >
Indeed it is not due to dropped tiff/geotiff functions. Let me re-upload with the fix. -- Francesco P. Lovergine _______________________________________________ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
