On 02-11-13 10:00, Paul Gevers wrote:
> [Please be aware that if you reply to a bug report, the original
> reported does NOT get your message automatically.]
> On 31-10-13 23:38, Hamish wrote:
>> yes, we're aware of it; sorry not much insight so far on how to fix it.
>> also I'm a little surprised that the ppc64 and s390x big-endian error*
>> seems to have fixed itself without us applying our patch-from-trunk
>> to it yet. (??)
>> [*] http://bugs.debian.org/672719
> Could it be that this is fixed (or prevented automatically) in some
> recent update in the tool chain? Do you want me to test this on a
> porterbox? Could you point me to your patch-from-trunk patch that you
> wanted to apply to fix the ppc64 and s390x FTBFS? Why did you leave that
> bug open anyway?
> Paul

Hmm, were did you get the impression that ppc64 and s390x actually did
build? They seem to be still failing as far as I can tell, but not
blocking anything as grass has never been build successfully on those archs.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Pkg-grass-devel mailing list

Reply via email to