On 01/13/2014 11:26 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 09:13:39PM +0100, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>>> Just as a side note I use git-buildpackage for all packages in d-gis tree.
>> Further investigation shows that a missing --pristine-tar was not the cause.
>> My commit of the new upstream version deleted the .gitignore file, while
>> it is included in the upstream tarball and not touched by the repacking.
>> http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-grass/gdal.git;a=commitdiff;h=864bb9ee6237551dc25377be642bf59cb6c48644
>> Adding the .gitignore file back to the upstream branch makes the
>> pristine-tar checkout tarball identical to the one in the archive.
> I have checked out the original source via `apt-get source gdal` and
> I get:
> $ md5sum gdal_1.10.1+dfsg.orig.tar.gz 
> 65f908560558b4801daa6946e52a03a6  gdal_1.10.1+dfsg.orig.tar.gz
> If I'm using the pristine-tar from the git repository I get:
> $ md5sum gdal_1.10.1+dfsg.orig.tar.gz 
> d4960006e29570a8e5c0c8824f7c725c  gdal_1.10.1+dfsg.orig.tar.gz
> (File size is different as well.)
> So something remains wrong here.

Correct. I was comparing the wrong file, and rejoiced prematurely.

This looked good, but wasn't the orig.tar.gz checked out by
pristine-tar, that lived in /tmp :(

65f908560558b4801daa6946e52a03a6  gdal_1.10.1+dfsg.orig.tar.gz
65f908560558b4801daa6946e52a03a6  gdal_1.10.1+dfsg.orig.tar.gz.archive
d4960006e29570a8e5c0c8824f7c725c  gdal_1.10.1+dfsg.orig.tar.gz.pristine

I've commited the orig.tar.gz from the archive in the pristine-tar
branch, checking that out does work.

Kind Regards,


GnuPG: 0xE88D4AF1 (new) / 0x77A975AD (old)

Pkg-grass-devel mailing list

Reply via email to