Your message dated Fri, 05 Sep 2014 00:16:16 +0200 with message-id <5408e4b0.2080...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#739261: libhdf5-openmpi-dev: Version in stable (wheezy) does not work with gfortran from stable has caused the Debian Bug report #739261, regarding libhdf5-openmpi-dev: Version in stable (wheezy) does not work with gfortran from stable to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 739261: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=739261 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---Package: libhdf5-openmpi-dev Version: 1.8.8-9 Severity: normal The current version in wheezy was not built using the current version of gfortran in wheezy, and compilation fails: prompt> h5fc h5_crtdat.f90 h5_crtdat.f90:26.6: USE HDF5 ! This module contains all necessary modules 1 Fatal Error: Wrong module version '6' (expected '9') for file 'hdf5.mod' ---------------------- The first line of /usr/include/hdf5.mod reads: GFORTRAN module version '6' created from ../../../../fortran/src/HDF5mpio.f90 on Thu Mar 8 11:40:49 2012 This is issue #630986 manifesting itself again, and a rebuild in a current wheezy environment is enough to solve this problem. It would be nice to see such a rebuilt in upcoming stable (wheezy) releases. Thanks Arne Nordmark -- System Information: Debian Release: 7.4 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=sv_SE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=sv_SE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages libhdf5-openmpi-dev depends on: ii hdf5-helpers 1.8.8-9 ii libhdf5-openmpi-7 1.8.8-9 ii libjpeg8-dev [libjpeg-dev] 8d-1 ii libopenmpi-dev 1.4.5-1 ii zlib1g-dev 1:1.2.7.dfsg-13 libhdf5-openmpi-dev recommends no packages. Versions of packages libhdf5-openmpi-dev suggests: pn libhdf5-doc <none> -- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Adam D. Barratt a écrit , Le 04/09/2014 23:51: > On Thu, 2014-09-04 at 23:26 +0200, Gilles Filippini wrote: >> [resending because of a previously malformed address] >> >> Hi, >> >> On Fri, 13 Jun 2014 11:22:03 +0200 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort >> <po...@debian.org> wrote: >>> On 12/06/14 21:51, Gilles Filippini wrote: >>>> nmu hdf5_1.8.8-9 . amd64 i386 kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386 . stable . -m >>>> "Rebuild with current gfortran in wheezy (closes: #739261)" >>>> >>>> Hoping to get it right this time :/ >>> >>> Scheduled. This still needs to be accepted by the SRMs for the next point >>> release. >> >> I fail to see any move on this side. > > Then your vision is faulty. :) I was looking at the buildd log page  where the binNMU is reported 'Uploaded' (not 'Installed').  https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=hdf5&suite=wheezy > >> Is there anything I could do to >> have this binNMU accepted into stable? > > Travel back to July this year, when the update was released. > > See https://www.debian.org/News/2014/20140712 and > > libhdf5-7 | 1.8.8-9 | stable | armel, armhf, ia64, mips, mipsel, > powerpc, s390, s390x, sparc > libhdf5-7 | 1.8.8-9+b1 | stable | amd64, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, > kfreebsd-i386 Then I apologize for the noise :) Thanks, _g.
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkgemail@example.com http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel