Your message dated Fri, 05 Sep 2014 00:16:16 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#739261: libhdf5-openmpi-dev: Version in stable
(wheezy) does not work with gfortran from stable
has caused the Debian Bug report #739261,
regarding libhdf5-openmpi-dev: Version in stable (wheezy) does not work with
gfortran from stable
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
739261: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=739261
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libhdf5-openmpi-dev
Version: 1.8.8-9
Severity: normal
The current version in wheezy was not built using the current version of
gfortran in wheezy,
and compilation fails:
prompt> h5fc h5_crtdat.f90
h5_crtdat.f90:26.6:
USE HDF5 ! This module contains all necessary modules
1
Fatal Error: Wrong module version '6' (expected '9') for file
'hdf5.mod'
----------------------
The first line of /usr/include/hdf5.mod reads:
GFORTRAN module version '6' created from ../../../../fortran/src/HDF5mpio.f90
on Thu Mar 8 11:40:49 2012
This is issue #630986 manifesting itself again, and a rebuild in a current
wheezy environment
is enough to solve this problem.
It would be nice to see such a rebuilt in upcoming stable (wheezy) releases.
Thanks
Arne Nordmark
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.4
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=sv_SE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=sv_SE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages libhdf5-openmpi-dev depends on:
ii hdf5-helpers 1.8.8-9
ii libhdf5-openmpi-7 1.8.8-9
ii libjpeg8-dev [libjpeg-dev] 8d-1
ii libopenmpi-dev 1.4.5-1
ii zlib1g-dev 1:1.2.7.dfsg-13
libhdf5-openmpi-dev recommends no packages.
Versions of packages libhdf5-openmpi-dev suggests:
pn libhdf5-doc <none>
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Adam D. Barratt a écrit , Le 04/09/2014 23:51:
> On Thu, 2014-09-04 at 23:26 +0200, Gilles Filippini wrote:
>> [resending because of a previously malformed address]
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Fri, 13 Jun 2014 11:22:03 +0200 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> On 12/06/14 21:51, Gilles Filippini wrote:
>>>> nmu hdf5_1.8.8-9 . amd64 i386 kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386 . stable . -m
>>>> "Rebuild with current gfortran in wheezy (closes: #739261)"
>>>>
>>>> Hoping to get it right this time :/
>>>
>>> Scheduled. This still needs to be accepted by the SRMs for the next point
>>> release.
>>
>> I fail to see any move on this side.
>
> Then your vision is faulty.
:)
I was looking at the buildd log page [1] where the binNMU is reported
'Uploaded' (not 'Installed').
[1] https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=hdf5&suite=wheezy
>
>> Is there anything I could do to
>> have this binNMU accepted into stable?
>
> Travel back to July this year, when the update was released.
>
> See https://www.debian.org/News/2014/20140712 and
>
> libhdf5-7 | 1.8.8-9 | stable | armel, armhf, ia64, mips, mipsel,
> powerpc, s390, s390x, sparc
> libhdf5-7 | 1.8.8-9+b1 | stable | amd64, i386, kfreebsd-amd64,
> kfreebsd-i386
Then I apologize for the noise :)
Thanks,
_g.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
Pkg-grass-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
