On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 23:20:59 +0200, Jérémy Lal wrote:

> > Failing to build on a release architecture is generally an RC bug, which
> > prevents testing migration.
> >
> > Kind Regards,
> >
> > Bas
> >
> >
> I'm very surprised by this. The opposite was explained to me on
> #debian-devel by
> by Julien Cristau (cc-ing him in case he can tell me how i got this the
> wrong way).
> Is this written somewhere ?
Failing to build on a release architecture is not an RC bug, unless it's
a regression.  See section 4 of

If there's no version of the package on ${architecture} in unstable
(either because it never built or because old builds have been removed),
then a failure to build on ${architecture} is somewhere between
wishlist and important, but it's not RC.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Pkg-grass-devel mailing list

Reply via email to