On 08/02/2015 12:37 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 03-07-15 15:13, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> - If there are no reverse dependencies, it should be the package
>> maintainers decision if a transition is needed. However this might
>> break software which is not in the Debian archive, and built
>> against these packages.
> ossim doesn't have any reverse dependencies, so I don't think any
> special consideration is required for the GCC 5 related transitions.
thanks for checking. Please mention this in the changelog for the next upload.
Pkg-grass-devel mailing list