On 08/02/2015 12:37 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 03-07-15 15:13, Matthias Klose wrote:
>>  - If there are no reverse dependencies, it should be the package
>>    maintainers decision if a transition is needed.  However this might
>>    break software which is not in the Debian archive, and built
>>    against these packages.
> ossim doesn't have any reverse dependencies, so I don't think any
> special consideration is required for the GCC 5 related transitions.

thanks for checking. Please mention this in the changelog for the next upload.

Pkg-grass-devel mailing list

Reply via email to