On 03-08-15 14:40, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 19-07-15 20:40, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> On 07/03/2015 03:10 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
>>>  - If there are no reverse dependencies, it should be the package
>>>    maintainers decision if a transition is needed.  However this might
>>>    break software which is not in the Debian archive, and built
>>>    against these packages.
>>
>> Just like pktools (#791240), geographic lib doesn't have any reverse
>> dependencies. We'll only need to update the symbols on all architectures
>> when the new libstdc++ is moved to unstable.
> 
> It's currently not possible to build liblas due to uninstallable
> dependencies, anything build depending on gdal will pull in libdap which
> libstdc++ breaks.

This is not the liblas bugreport, and fortunately geographiclib is not
affects by uninstallable build dependencies, so I've uploaded
geographiclib (1.43-3~exp1) to experimental with updates symbols for
amd64 with GCC 5, I'll upload it to unstable after updating the symbols
for the other architectures.

Kind Regards,

Bas

-- 
 GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146  50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1

_______________________________________________
Pkg-grass-devel mailing list
Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel

Reply via email to