-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 27-08-15 01:58, Gilles Filippini wrote:
> I just don't understand why this bug was assigned back to src:hdf5.
> A piece of explanation from vorlon would have been appreciated.
> Anyway, I'll assign it back to release.d.o when I'll have the
> rdepends builds checked.

I suspect this was because he's doing the GCC 5 transition in Ubuntu,
and they've chosen to do a v5 rename for hdf5 (like they've done for
netcdf and others too). He probably didn't want to do another
transition, but this is all an educated guess.

I suggest to reassign the hdf5 transition issue back to
release.debian.org, because I would also like to see a single hdf5
transition instead of two (I made the same decisions for netcdf & geos).

Kind Regards,

Bas

- -- 
 GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146  50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=48Hu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Pkg-grass-devel mailing list
Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel

Reply via email to