On 12-09-15 23:04, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> 2015-09-12 21:56 GMT+02:00 Sebastiaan Couwenberg <sebas...@xs4all.nl>:
>> Please share your thoughts about the future of the mapnik-vector-tile,
>> and its reverse dependencies (node-mapnik &
>> node-tilelive-{bridge,mapnik,vector}).
>>
>> [...]
> 
> My position is that it is good to have node-mapnik in debian, because it's
> not that easy to
> install otherwise - and i'm quite motivated to update it, but i'll find
> time to do it before the end of the year.

Alright. If we're going to keep node-mapnik around, we need to get
mapnik-vector-tile (0.10.0+dfsg-1) ready for upload.

Do you prefer a separate mapnik-clipper package, or just bundling
clipper.{c,h}pp in mapnik-vector-tile?

Kind Regards,

Bas

-- 
 GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146  50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1

_______________________________________________
Pkg-grass-devel mailing list
Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel

Reply via email to