Hi Ilias, On 12.10.24 14:16, Ilias Tsitsimpis wrote:
My understanding is that the original code by IIJ had a BSD license, but the code in the test/HieDemoSpec.hs file is now licensed under ISC.
yes, but all parts of the original code are still licensed under the BSD licencse.
You can not change the original license by choosing a different one.
It retains the original copyright notice (which we have in d/copyright), but the license is no longer BSD. This is why I chose not to mention the BSD license (as it could imply that this file is using a dual-license).
It somehow is licensed under "ISC and BSD3".
Do you believe this is something we should mention in d/copyright, and how should I do it?
I didn't check how much original code is still present, but I would suggest to add a separate block for test/HieDemoSpec.hs with license ISC and an additional comment that parts of the file are copyright by IIJ and under a BSD license.
Thorsten
_______________________________________________ Pkg-haskell-maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-haskell-maintainers
