Your message dated Wed, 19 Oct 2005 02:17:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#327354: fixed in batik 1.6-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Sep 2005 12:41:58 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 09 05:41:58 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from bbnrelbul01.net.external.hp.com
(bbnrelbul01.bastion.europe.hp.com) [155.208.255.20]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EDiCc-00027T-00; Fri, 09 Sep 2005 05:41:58 -0700
Received: from concerto.grenoble.hp.com (concerto.grenoble.hp.com
[15.128.15.118])
by bbnrelbul01.bastion.europe.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7BDE3CA87;
Fri, 9 Sep 2005 14:41:50 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (bhenzgen1.emea.cpqcorp.net
[16.57.181.179] (may be forged))
by concerto.grenoble.hp.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_28760_binary)/8.9.3 SMKit6.0.6
OpenMail) with ESMTP id OAA06347;
Fri, 9 Sep 2005 14:41:49 +0200 (METDST)
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Eric Lavarde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libbatik-java: Batik doesn't bring pdf-transcoder.jar but doesn't work
either with fop.
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2005 14:42:04 +0200
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: libbatik-java
Version: 1.5.1-1
Severity: normal
Hi,
I'm trying to package the next version of FreeMind (0.8.0) for Debian,
which has a plugin to export SVG and PDF.
The SVG export works well with the batik package from Debian, but I need
to keep the pdf-transcoder.jar within my package, because fop doesn't
seem to be a proper replacement, even though pdf-transcoder.jar seems
to come from this project.
If I replace pdf-transcoder.jar through fop.jar (from fop 0.20.5-5) in
the FreeMind environment, I get the following exceptions:
org.apache.batik.transcoder.TranscoderException: The specified XML document
fragment is not an SVG document
at org.apache.fop.svg.PDFTranscoder.transcode(PDFTranscoder.java:163)
at org.apache.batik.transcoder.XMLAbstractTranscoder.transcode(Unknown
Source)
at plugins.svg.ExportPdf.startupMapHook(ExportPdf.java:70)
at
freemind.modes.ControllerAdapter.invokeHook(ControllerAdapter.java:1583)
I understand the Debian given necessity to remove pdf-transcoder.jar
from the Batik package, but it shouldn't break an essential (for me ;-))
feature of the same. As batik depends on fop for this feature, I place
the bug report on the dependent package (but you might decide
otherwise). At the end batik might recommend a specific version of fop,
with which it works (just an idea).
If the solution is to patch FreeMind to work with batik+fop from Debian,
it's also acceptable if you help me doing this... :->
Thanks, Eric
PS: I work solely with j2sdk1.4 if you wonder about the dependencies below.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1,
'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686
Locale: LANG=en_IE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_IE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Versions of packages libbatik-java depends on:
ii java-common 0.22 Base of all Java packages
ii libbsf-java 1:2.3.0+cvs20050308-2 Bean Scripting Framework to suppor
ii libxalan2-java 2.6.0-1 XSL Transformations (XSLT) process
ii sun-j2re1.5 [java2 1.5.0+update03 Java(TM) 2 RE, Standard Edition, S
ii sun-j2sdk1.4 [j2re 1.4.2+08 Java(TM) 2 SDK, Standard Edition,
libbatik-java recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 327354-close) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Oct 2005 09:18:50 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 19 02:18:50 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ESA4G-0002dJ-00; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 02:17:04 -0700
From: Wolfgang Baer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#327354: fixed in batik 1.6-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 02:17:04 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2
Source: batik
Source-Version: 1.6-1
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
batik, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
batik_1.6-1.diff.gz
to pool/contrib/b/batik/batik_1.6-1.diff.gz
batik_1.6-1.dsc
to pool/contrib/b/batik/batik_1.6-1.dsc
batik_1.6.orig.tar.gz
to pool/contrib/b/batik/batik_1.6.orig.tar.gz
libbatik-java_1.6-1_all.deb
to pool/contrib/b/batik/libbatik-java_1.6-1_all.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Wolfgang Baer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated batik package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 19:29:22 +0200
Source: batik
Binary: libbatik-java
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.6-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers
<[email protected]>
Changed-By: Wolfgang Baer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
libbatik-java - xml.apache.org SVG Library
Closes: 306639 327354
Changes:
batik (1.6-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New upstream release
+ Updated copyright to Apache 2.0 License
* libant1.6-java to ant transition
* Use JAVA_HOME dirs as generated by java-package (closes: #306639)
* Include, build and ship the pdf-transcoder from fop CVS (closes: #327354)
+ See README.Debian-source for details about the transcoder source
+ Added build-deps and depends on libavalon-framework-java,
libcommons-io-java and libcommons-logging-java for the pdf-transcoder
+ Patched build.xml to call the pdf-transcoder build target
* Removed Ola and Stephan from uploaders
* Extended description a little bit
* Standards-Version 3.6.2 (no changes)
Files:
39b79d1331133b7498803db8c2ef9282 837 contrib/libs optional batik_1.6-1.dsc
73c563d2586aa486f9021be7e34b66b8 5366839 contrib/libs optional
batik_1.6.orig.tar.gz
ccddcbf5530f6b241f4477349f9126ad 6775 contrib/libs optional batik_1.6-1.diff.gz
fbc1960128758c5c59415d17c11d048c 4885190 contrib/libs optional
libbatik-java_1.6-1_all.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDVgxx4vzFZu62tMIRArrQAJwMAyB5ZVvRBDe9oO0MVF4A4n3gLACdHUeD
K1N36qxMlBRvF0Oq0lSO5/c=
=bH24
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
