Le Mon 19/12/2005, Philipp Meier disait > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Erwan David schrieb: > > Le Sat 17/12/2005, Arnaud Vandyck disait > > > >>1° This is not a bug for me, Eclipse runs fine on Debian... and with > >>free software; > > > > > > I understood that for them gnome is the graal everybody should use, so I > > close > > this, and won't use eclipse on debian. I'll also stop support for eclipse on > > debian at work, and eclipse user will stay with windows, it is no use to > > make > > them try "something else" if they get the same shit at the end. > > I do not comment on the technical details of this discussion but I want > to point out that it's totally your decision whether to use eclipse or a > commercial alternative on any os you decide to -- but it's IMHO bad > style to rant about a piece of open source software and refusing to > improve it. I did now find any really constructive proposal from you.
When I see lies like in this discussion, nothing could be seen as "constructuive". 1) It is not the software which depends on gnome it is a decision from the debian package mainteainers. 2) there reasons are *lies*. gnome-vfs won't gove them "the list of installed browser". It will give them the list of *gnome* installed browsers. They choose to make the user prisonner of a system which I consider the only constructive way to use it is to refuse anything that wants it. Now If I had the time and the knowlegdge I might try to propose alternatives, but I won't learn the intruisics of a system I consider is a failure from the first idea juste for this. I have other things to do than learning inneficient ways to use my computers juste because some moron decided the windows way was the only acceptable and that users are idiots. -- Erwan _______________________________________________ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
