Your message dated Mon, 23 Apr 2007 20:47:36 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Please remove build-dependency on libgcj-dev
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libglade-java
Version: 2.10.1-1
Severity: wishlist
The gcj package is a meta-package which depends on the gcj and
libgcjX-dev package corresponding to the default compiler. At the
moment, this is gcj-4.0 and libcj6-dev. When 4.1 will be the default,
this will be changed to gcj-4.1 and libcj7-dev. Given that gcj depends
on the -dev package, you don't need to list it explicitly in your
build-dependencies. Please drop it.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libglade-java
Version: 2.12.3-1
On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 06:41:27PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Package: libglade-java
> Version: 2.10.1-1
> Severity: wishlist
>
> The gcj package is a meta-package which depends on the gcj and
> libgcjX-dev package corresponding to the default compiler. At the
> moment, this is gcj-4.0 and libcj6-dev. When 4.1 will be the default,
> this will be changed to gcj-4.1 and libcj7-dev. Given that gcj depends
> on the -dev package, you don't need to list it explicitly in your
> build-dependencies. Please drop it.
That bug was fixed in version 2.12.3-1.
Regards,
Thomas
--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
