On Sat, Apr 28, 2007 at 07:05:48PM +0200, Julien BLACHE wrote: > Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > No. the problem is that current java-gcj-compat is broken with current > > gcj-4.1. gcj-4.1 was updated lately, java-gcj-compat not. Newer > > java-gcj-compat needs to be moved to unstable. > > And what about ant depending on an appropriate version of > java-gcj-compat-dev ? You're at fault for this one.
Ant was build long time ago. Currently the same version of ant is in etch/stable and sid/unstable. It doesnt a new java-gcj-compat, just a working one. Making it Build-Depending on a new java-gcj-compat makes backporting stuff to etch/stable unneccesarily hard. Cheers, Michael -- .''`. | Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : | Free Java Developer <http://www.classpath.org> `. `' | `- | 1024D/BAC5 4B28 D436 95E6 F2E0 BD11 5923 A008 2763 483B _______________________________________________ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
