Your message dated Tue, 3 Jul 2007 12:28:57 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#394745: libxerces2-java: remove dependency on
libjaxp1.3-java
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libxerces2-java
Version: 2.8.0-1
Severity: wishlist
For some reasons (bootstrapping?) we split the JAXP APIs from Xerces
into separate source packages libjaxp1.2-java and
libjaxp1.3-java. This is error prone, as evidenced by bug #394221.
I suggest building the latest JAXP API package together with Xerces so
that the correct version will be installed automatically. The older
versions can be built separately. (But they should really be
obsolete.)
For bootstrapping _only_, a package libjaxp1.3-bootstrap-java can be
built. Even this is probably unnecessary since libgcj now contains
JAXP APIs.
Comments please?
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1,
'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-1-686
Locale: LANG=sv_SE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=sv_SE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Versions of packages libxerces2-java depends on:
ii gij [java2-runtime] 4:4.1.1-11 The GNU Java bytecode interpreter
ii gij-4.1 [java1-runtime] 4.1.1-16 The GNU Java bytecode interpreter
ii kaffe-pthreads [java1-runtime 2:1.1.7-4 A POSIX threads enabled version of
ii libjaxp1.2-java 1.2.01-1 Java XML parser and transformer AP
ii sun-java5-jre [java2-runtime] 1.5.0-08-1 Sun Java(TM) Runtime Environment (
libxerces2-java recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 7/3/07, Marcus Better <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think we can close the bug.
Guess so!
done ;-)
--
Arnaud Vandyck
--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
