On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 12:48:16 +0000, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi!
Hi Alexander, > I'm sorry, but I reject your package, as the Academic Free License version > 2.1 > is despite its name considered non DFSG-free. See for example > http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/10/msg00237.html and > http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/10/msg00240.html. As sponsor of this package, let me clarify that : 0) I agree with you : AFL is non-DFSG compliant license 1) This part of source code is dual licenced under AFL 2.1 / modified BSD licence [1] Files: projects/spring-js/src/main/resources/META-INF/dojo/* Copyright: © 2004-2008 The Dojo Foundation License: Academic Free License >= 2.1, Modified BSD license 2) This part of source code is NOT included in binary package and, IIRC, binary package Recommends: libjs-dojo-core, libjs-dojo-dojox [2] [3] Is it there anythong else that prevents you from ACCEPT this package ? [1] http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-java/libspring-webflow-2.0-java.git;a=blob_plain;f=debian/copyright;hb=HEAD [2] http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/d/dojo/current/copyright [3] http://packages.qa.debian.org/d/dojo.html Cheers, -- Damien __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers>. Please use [email protected] for discussions and questions.
