Your message dated Tue, 25 Jan 2011 16:28:20 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: chef: remove from squeeze because of solr (#602697)? (was
Re: Bug#602697: chef-solr depends on solr)
has caused the Debian Bug report #602697,
regarding should not be included in squeeze
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
602697: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=602697
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: solr
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
I've written a mail ("Remove Solr from Squeeze?") on 2010/10/12 to
debian-java and the package's maintainer Jan-Pascal van Best and
proposed the removal of solr from Squeeze, mainly because:
- - it's already outdated a year by now (see bug #602696 )
- - it doesn't even include all contribs (see bug #602695 )
- - the package has accumulated too many bugs
- - there doesn't seem to be enough (wo)man power to maintain the package
right now on a standard that would make it fit for Debian _stable_
So until nothing else happens, please don't include solr in Debian
squeeze.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)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=TqjB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi there!
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 13:58:57 +0100, Victor Seva wrote:
> 2011/1/25 Luca Capello <[email protected]>:
>>>>> It's also in lenny (albeit in contrib) so if it were removed then a
>>>>> migration path for those users to a replacement would be good.
>>>
>>> Given that chef-solr was not in lenny, the above applies to solr only.
>>> However, I should say that I do not know at all a good migration path.
>>
>> This concern still stands, but given that no one has shown interest in
>> implementing this in mostly two months, I would say that we should
>> simply remove solr from squeeze.
>>
>> For the Release Team: should I file an RM bug or this one is sufficient?
>
> AFAIK solr has been removed already from squeeze.
Thank you for the notification, my fault I did checked before only for
chef, bug closed:
<http://packages.qa.debian.org/s/solr/news/20101215T163915Z.html>
Thx, bye,
Gismo / Luca
pgpc8ghxzmVPa.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
<http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers>. Please
use
[email protected] for discussions and questions.
