Hi, I was also just testing it, all combinations I tried didn't work with the built package you provided. Miguel do you want access into my server, just so you can verify ? I should also note my server is a xen domu, but that should make absolutely no difference.
I will also try compiling it / building my own package and will let you know if that works for me also. All the best, Vamegh On 4 February 2011 22:49, Nelson Lago <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 7:39 PM, Miguel Landaeta <[email protected]> wrote: >> I prepared a new package for 1.2.31. >> Would you please test it? > > Your binary package itself did not work, BUT I took your sources and > created a debian package myself, and it works! > > I downloaded the files: > > libapache-mod-jk_1.2.31-0miguel1.dsc > libapache-mod-jk_1.2.31-0miguel1.debian.tar.gz > libapache-mod-jk_1.2.31.orig.tar.gz > > Then > > dpkg-source -x libapache-mod-jk_1.2.31-0miguel1.dsc > > then debian/rules binary > > I really do not understand why this happens, though. If the only > important difference here was the OpenVZ kernel, how would this > influence the compilation? > > If you also do not know what is going on, maybe this should be brought > to the attention of the mainstream authors. > __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers>. Please use [email protected] for discussions and questions.
