On 04/20/2012 06:45 PM, Miguel Landaeta wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 10:03:45PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>> Source: c3p0
>> Version: 0.9.1.2-5
>> Severity: serious
>> Tags: wheezy sid
>> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
>> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120419 qa-ftbfs
>> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
>> amd64.
>>
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I can't reproduce this in a current pbuilder sid chroot. I agree this
> package could use some love since its build is full of warnings and 
> whatnot but it is not FTBFS on me. Am I missing something?
> 
> I'm not tagging this as unreproducible until somebody else from the team
> can confirm it.

I have built the package 4 times now in clean wheezy and sid chroots on
amd64, and experienced 1 failure out of 4 (same exception as the one
Lucas reported, but for a different source file).  Perhaps the issue is
not with c3p0 but with gcj-jdk.

In the meantime, I am in the midst of updating the package for some of
the other outstanding bugs and issues.

Thank you,
tony

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
<http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers>. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Reply via email to