On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 12:10:30PM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
> On 09/20/2012 07:05 AM, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> >  It's my mistake that using static version for symlink... sorry for the 
> > mess.
> >  And a bit confusion for versioning, so prepared fix as below.
> >  If it seems to be okay, I'll upload to unstable.
> Hello Hideki,
> Thank you for the quick response.  The 2nd patch you supplied looks good
> to me.
> Also, I determined that I can build the jruby package successfully
> against the nailgun package in wheezy, which I think might be preferable
> anyway since this is a security bug that is being targeted for wheezy
> (right?).  The dependency on nailgun is a build-dep only, meaning that
> it doesn't appear in the jruby Depends, and jruby is an architecture
> "any" package.
> Moritz, for this bug with respect to wheezy, would you prefer that an
> updated package be uploaded to unstable + an unblock request, or would
> this be a case for targeting testing-security?

testing-security doesn't work currently (only testing-proposed-updates works),
so getting this via unstable (urgency=medium) and an unblock request is the
way to go forward.


This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Reply via email to