On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 12:10:30PM -0700, tony mancill wrote: > On 09/20/2012 07:05 AM, Hideki Yamane wrote: > > It's my mistake that using static version for symlink... sorry for the > > mess. > > And a bit confusion for versioning, so prepared fix as below. > > If it seems to be okay, I'll upload to unstable. > > Hello Hideki, > > Thank you for the quick response. The 2nd patch you supplied looks good > to me. > > Also, I determined that I can build the jruby package successfully > against the nailgun package in wheezy, which I think might be preferable > anyway since this is a security bug that is being targeted for wheezy > (right?). The dependency on nailgun is a build-dep only, meaning that > it doesn't appear in the jruby Depends, and jruby is an architecture > "any" package. > > Moritz, for this bug with respect to wheezy, would you prefer that an > updated package be uploaded to unstable + an unblock request, or would > this be a case for targeting testing-security?
testing-security doesn't work currently (only testing-proposed-updates works), so getting this via unstable (urgency=medium) and an unblock request is the way to go forward. Cheers, Moritz __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers>. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.