On Sat, 2 Feb 2013 23:08:18 +0000 Stuart Prescott wrote:

> There has been some further discussion and suggestions on how this could be 
> handled in the short term and also in the longer term in the following thread:
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/openicc/2013q1/004907.html

Can we make some progress on this bug?
I don't know much about colorimetry and ICC profiles, but I would
really like to see this issue solved.

I've just glanced over the thread you pointed out.

It seems to me that one suggestion is to use
compatibleWithAdobeRGB1998.icc or sRGB.icc from the icc-profiles-free
package [1].

[1] http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/openicc/2013q1/004931.html

Can this work correctly? Can this be done?

I would rather avoid using files released under the ugly GNU AfferoGPL
v3 (such as those in the argyll package), as I personally consider such
works as non-free (I disagree with the ftp-masters' conclusions on this

[2] https://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2007/11/msg00233.html
[3] http://bugs.debian.org/495721#28

 New GnuPG key, see the transition document!
..................................................... Francesco Poli .
 GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82  3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE

Attachment: pgp4d0WJLlNpb.pgp
Description: PGP signature

This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Reply via email to