On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 6:15 PM, Markus Koschany <a...@gambaru.de> wrote:
> Control: tags 566901 patch
> Hi Vincent,
> On 17.10.2013 15:07, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
>> I don't have the time to review the patch right now. I can have a
>> look this week-end, if you want more eyes, but if you feel confident
>> about the current state, I don't mind an upload as-is.
> No worries. Tony Mancill has uploaded the bug fixes for #725461 already.
> Now I'm attaching the debdiff with all the changes to split the package
> into libbatik-java and batik.
> I can confirm that these rdeps still build fine with those changes:
> osmosis (FTBFS because of a another bug)
Good job for checking all that !
> As you said verifying that everything works as intended is time
> consuming. Therefore I have targeted the new revision for experimental.
> I suggest to ask the maintainers/uploaders of these rdeps to confirm
> that their packages still work fine with the new version as soon as it
> enters experimental. Hopefully this will speed things up a little.
That's definitely the way to go. I can review/sponsor this upload
this week-end if you wish.
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.