On 01/05/2014 03:49 PM, Roland Stigge wrote:
> On 05/01/14 19:08, tony mancill wrote:
>>> jblas FTBFS on most architectures since tests are enabled in
>>> 1.2.0-5. E.g., on powerpc:
>>
>> Thanks for the bug report.  I wonder if jblas actually functional
>> at all on those architectures before this upload anyway.
> 
> I can run individual test for you if you. Just tell.

Hi Roland,

thanks for the offer.  I'm currently using the s390x porter box,
zelenka, which is at least enough to reproduce the test failure (and
crash the JVM if I add the JNI .so to the LD_LIBRARY_PATH before running
the upstream tests).

I still wonder whether this package has ever been useful on
non-i386/amd64 architectures.  For the short-term, so the ruby
transition can move forward, we could temporarily either disable to
tests or constrain the architectures.  Between those 2, I prefer the
latter.  Thoughts?

Thank you,
tony




Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
<http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers>. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Reply via email to