On 30/05/14 10:32, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Le 30/05/2014 11:11, Matthew Vernon a écrit : > >> What would you prefer? i) has the advantages of leaving the source as >> upstream have it in their SVN ; ii) is perhaps the right compromise >> option; iii) seems too extreme. > > IMHO if the minified JavaScript files are only test objects they should > be left as is (assuming they are available under an appropriate license).
It's difficult to determine what license they might be covered by; AFAICT they are the result of pointing something like wget at a bunch of sites, namely: cnn.com, deadspin.com, fark.com, google.com, microsoft.com, slashdot.org They're used for testing the performance of the library; the library is aimed at letting you handle user-supplied HTML/CSS safely (i.e. avoiding XSS etc.) [see https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Category:OWASP_AntiSamy_Project for more on the purpose of antisamy] Regards, Matthew __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers>. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.