On 27.06.2014 12:14, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
> 23.06.2014 15:36, Timo Aaltonen kirjoitti:
>> 23.06.2014 13:51, Thorsten Alteholz kirjoitti:
>>> On Mon, 23 Jun 2014, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
>>>> Actually, all package.html that I can find do have that header but in
>>>> html comment format.. did you mean some other files and if so, which
>>> Ooops, sorry, I meant those files, but the file viewer stripped the html
>>> comment here.
>>> So only ./SCD.jj doesn't have this header ..
>> Right, and it's fixed in upstream trunk so I've added a patch to add
>> that to our version.
>> about the 'packager/legal/LICENSE.txt' upstream (Miroslav Kos) said
>> 'Regarding license file location, you are correct - it is located at
>> or you can use the online version:
>> but I've asked them to change the paths for the next version. Is this
> They'll move license.txt to the path pointed by headers, so it'll be
> fixed upstream in a future release.
> another revision of xsom got re-uploaded, could you have another look?
Ping? It's been a while, and xsom is a blocker for the next set of
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.