On 09/08/2014 02:43 PM, Adam Borowski wrote:
> Package: src:java-gnome
> Version: 4.1.3-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
> 
> Hi!
> During an archive rebuild on armhf, your package failed to build, despite
> multiple retries.  It does, however, build successfully on amd64, while the
> error sounds like something that should be independent of architecture.
> 
> .--==[ tail of the log
> dh_installudev -plibjava-gnome-java-doc 
> dh_lintian -plibjava-gnome-java-doc 
> dh_bugfiles -plibjava-gnome-java-doc 
> dh_install -plibjava-gnome-java-doc  
> cp: cannot stat './doc/api/': No such file or directory
> dh_install: cp -a ./doc/api/
> debian/libjava-gnome-java-doc//usr/share/doc/libjava-gnome-java// returned 
> exit code 1
> make: *** [binary-install/libjava-gnome-java-doc] Error 2
> /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/debhelper.mk:211: recipe for target 
> /'binary-install/libjava-gnome-java-doc' failed
> dpkg-buildpackage: error: fakeroot debian/rules binary gave error exit status 
> 2
> `----

Hi Adam,

Ah, yes... CDBS strikes again!  Thank you for reporting this.  There is
no need for the -doc package to be built on all architectures.

Cheers,
tony


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
<http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers>. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Reply via email to