Your message dated Thu, 28 May 2015 14:11:30 +0200
with message-id <556705f2.3050...@gambaru.de>
and subject line Re: libcodemodel-java: Please update to new upstream version 
(currently 2.6)
has caused the Debian Bug report #692349,
regarding libcodemodel-java: Please update to new upstream version (currently 
2.6)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
692349: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=692349
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libcodemodel-java
Version: 2.1-1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch

Dear Maintainer,
please consider updating... New versions seem to be mostly bugfixes, but
having a much older version in debian makes it harder to package projects
using codemodel. Upgrade seems mostly straightforward, there
are some trivial URL changes, but there's a new dependency: istack-commons.
It is a utility library [1], which currently is not packaged for debian.
I'll create a RFP shortly.

[1] http://istack-commons.java.net/

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (101, 
'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.5-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages libcodemodel-java depends on:
ii  ant    1.8.2-4
ii  junit  3.8.2-8

libcodemodel-java recommends no packages.

libcodemodel-java suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information
diff --git debian/maven.rules debian/maven.rules
index 5a05d95..7a18cf5 100644
--- debian/maven.rules
+++ debian/maven.rules
@@ -16,5 +16,5 @@
 # and version starting with 3., replacing the version with 3.x
 #   junit junit jar s/3\\..*/3.x/
 
-junit junit jar s/3\..*/3.x/ * *
+junit junit jar s/4\..*/4.x/ * *
 s/ant/org.apache.ant/ * * s/.*/debian/ * *
diff --git pom.xml pom.xml
index a3896cd..d443b55 100644
--- pom.xml
+++ pom.xml
@@ -49,11 +49,6 @@
     <url>http://codemodel.java.net/</url>
     <version>2.6</version>
     <packaging>pom</packaging>
-    <parent>
-        <groupId>net.java</groupId>
-        <artifactId>jvnet-parent</artifactId>
-        <version>1</version>
-    </parent>
     <modules>
         <module>codemodel</module>
         <module>codemodel-annotation-compiler</module>

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.6-1

On Mon, 05 Nov 2012 10:27:19 +0100
=?utf-8?q?Zbigniew_J=C4=99drzejewski-Szmek?= <zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:
> Package: libcodemodel-java
> Version: 2.1-1
> Severity: normal
> Tags: patch
> 
> Dear Maintainer,
> please consider updating... New versions seem to be mostly bugfixes, but
> having a much older version in debian makes it harder to package projects
> using codemodel. Upgrade seems mostly straightforward, there
> are some trivial URL changes, but there's a new dependency: istack-commons.
> It is a utility library [1], which currently is not packaged for debian.
> I'll create a RFP shortly.
> 
> [1] http://istack-commons.java.net/
> 

Hi,

apparently someone forgot to close this bug report. The latest version
of libcodemodel-java in the archive is 2.6, hence I am going to close
this bug report now.

Regards,

Markus

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
<http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers>. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Reply via email to