Am 05.10.2015 um 12:07 schrieb Emmanuel Bourg:
> On Sun, 04 Oct 2015 17:10:40 +0200 Gilles Filippini <p...@debian.org> wrote:
> 
>> Setting back severity to grave because ppc64el is an official
>> architecture since novembre 2014 and there is no point in providing
>> gluegen2 for ppc64el if it is unusable.
> 
> On the other hand, the affected architectures have a combined popcon of
> 0.3%. I don't think it's fair to push the severity to serious and risk a
> removal that would affect all the other architectures.

I think we should determine if upstream supports ppc64el. If not, it is
reasonable to remove ppc64el and other affected ports from the
Architecture field.

Regards,

Markus




Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
<http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers>. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Reply via email to