Your message dated Wed, 9 Dec 2015 21:43:46 +0100 with message-id <56689282.2000...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#792670: androidsdk-ddms: android sdk license appears to violate debian charter has caused the Debian Bug report #792670, regarding androidsdk-ddms: android sdk license appears to violate debian charter to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 792670: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=792670 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---Package: androidsdk-ddms Severity: important Dear Maintainer, i've been alerted to the following in the android sdk terms and conditions: 3.4 You agree that you will not take any actions that may cause or result in the fragmentation of Android, including but not limited to distributing, participating in the creation of, or promoting in any way a software development kit derived from the SDK. this is, in my mind, in clear violation of the debian charter and, if correct, means that the entire android sdk should be pulled, or at least moved to non-free. thoughts?
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---On Mon, 20 Jul 2015 19:39:30 +0100 Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <l...@lkcl.net> wrote: > hi emmanuel, dr stallman investigated and has this to point out: > > The Google SDK license contains this text > > 3.5 Use, reproduction and distribution of components of the SDK > licensed under an open source software license are governed solely > by the terms of that open source software license and not this > License Agreement. > > Since (as far as we know) all free software is open source, this has > the effect of withdrawing all their conditions from the SDK components > that are free. They are not violating the GNU GPL. > > Of course, the rest of their SDK is unethical because it is nonfree, > and people should not accept their conditions. Since we all agree that the sources are DFSG free, I am going to close this bug report now. Markus
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
__ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers>. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.