On 01/28/2016 06:42 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Hi Thomas, > > I think it would be preferable for every language to package the runtime > part of antlr separately. This will make the main antlr package easier > to maintain, and each runtime can be maintained by a language specific > team mastering the subtleties of its environment. > > This is for the runtime only, the generator part for the other languages > remains in the main antlr3 package obviously. > > Emmanuel Bourg
Emmanuel, The problem doing this, is that if antlr3 evolves and the Python module has some kind of adaptation, then we need to release them in sync. So its easier to have the antlr3 source package to also support the Python bindings. Also, there's no separate tarball for the antlr3 Python package, it's all-in-one. Let me know your thoughts. If you still don't change your mind, then I'll indeed package python-antlr3 separately, even though I don't think it is the right thing to do. Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo) __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers>. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.