Am 03.04.2016 um 19:36 schrieb Mattia Rizzolo: > control: reopen -1 > control: tag -1 + patch pending > > On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 08:29:19PM +0000, Markus Koschany <[email protected]> > wrote: >> On Mon, 08 Feb 2016 20:27:41 +0000 Matthias Klose <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Package: src:jalview >>> Version: 2.7.dfsg-4 >>> Severity: serious >>> User: [email protected] >>> Usertags: openjdk-8-transition >>> >>> The package build-depends or depends one an openjdk-7-* package, >>> which is scheduled for removal for stretch. Please do not depend >>> on a specific openjdk version, but on one of the default-java, >>> default-java-headless or default-jdk packages instead. >>> >>> default-java defaulting to openjdk-8 on most architectures is now >>> available in unstable. >> >> Hi, >> >> jalview neither depends or build-depends on openjdk-7-* packages. It >> builds fine with OpenJDK 8. I am going to close this bug as invalid now. > > Please be bothered to double check. > > jalview has a Depends (a binary relationship) on openjdk-7-jdk. > For this, a rebuild is enough to have it pick the right dep. > > I uploaded a thing to DELEYED/7, please tell me if I should deley > longer.
Hi, thanks for spotting the runtime dependency on openjdk-7-jre. It is somewhat strange that it exists though. However please cancel the upload because the removal of the alternative java6-runtime dependency is not correct. It is still provided by OpenJDK 8 and the non-free Oracle packages and it also simplifies backports. I will take care of the upload afterwards. Regards, Markus
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers>. Please use [email protected] for discussions and questions.
